Promoting and sustaining rural social innovation
Bringing together conclusions from previous studies of social innovation in rural, local, multi-stakeholder and welfare contexts, this study aims to further develop the scientific insights into the specific mechanisms of rural social innovation, based on a case study of the Swedish part of the European project “Social empowerment in rural areas” (SEMPRE). By analyzing its aims and activities, crucial aspects of rural social innovation are pinpointed in a way that helps discern the main challenges and potentials in promoting and sustaining such innovation. The identified aspects include the identification of urgent societal challenges of rural decline, initiatives to increase the rural attractiveness by innovative forms of social service delivery, empowering mobilization of vulnerable groups, such as rural immigrants, in social service design and delivery, multi-stakeholder involvement of local community actors, as well as participatory workshops to delineate needs/visions, develop solutions to these, and implement the solutions in micro-projects.
Aldea-Partanen, A. (2011). Social innovation in service delivery to youth in remote and rural areas’, International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development. Vol. 3, No. 1, pp.63–81.
André, I., Abreu, A., Carmo, A. (2013). Social innovation through the arts in rural areas: the case of Montemor-o-Novo. I Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A., Hamdouch, A. (red.). The international handbook on social innovation: collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Bailey, K. (2008). Methods of Social Research. New York: Free Press.
Berglund, K-E., Lindberg, M., Nahnfeldt, C. (2016). Social innovation now and then in the Church of Sweden. Diaconia Journal for the Study of Christian Social Practice. 7(2): 125–141.
Brandsen, T., Cattacin, S., Evers, A., Zimmers A. red. (2015). Social innovations in the urban context. London: Springer.
Brundenius, C., Göransson, B., Carvalho de Mello, J. M. (Eds.) (2016). Universities, Inclusive Development and Social Innovation: an international perspective. Cham: Springer.
Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2013). ‘Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework’, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, Vol. 82 No. 1, pp.42 - 51.
Copus, A., Perjo, L., Berlina, A., Jungsberg, L. Randall, L. and Sigurjónsdóttir, H. (2017). Social innovation in local development: Lessons from the Nordic countries and Scotland. Nordregio Working Paper 2017:2. Stockholm: Nordregio.
Davies, A. and Simon, J. (2013). The value and role of citizen engagement in social innovation. A deliverable of the project TEPSIE. Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.
Dawson, P. and Daniel, L. (2010). Understanding social innovation: a provisional framework. International Journal of Technology Management. 51(1): 9-21.
Dodd, J.A. and Franke, J. (2011). Towards a localised and comprehensive innovation policy in the EU. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, Vol. 3, No. 6, pp.535–550.
Eurich, J. and Langer, A. (2016). Social Innovations as Opportunities: How Can Innovations in Social Services Be Stimulated and Managed? Diaconia Journal for the Study of Christian Social Practice. 7(2): 174–190.
Evers, A., Ewert, B., Brandsen, T. red. (2014). Social innovations for social cohesion. Transnational patterns and approaches from 20 European cities. Liege: EMES European Research Network.
Godin, B. (2012). Social Innovation: Utopias of Innovation from c.1830 to the Present. Project on the Intellectual History of Innovation, Working Paper No. 11. Montreal: Institut national de la recherche scientifique (INRS).
Grimm, R., Fox, C., Baines, S., Albertson, K. (2013). Social innovation, an answer to contemporary societal challenges? Locating the concept in theory and practice. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Sciences. 26(4): 436–455.
Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Ionescu, C. (2015). About the conceptualization of social innovation. Theoretical & Applied Economics, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp.53 - 62.
Lindberg, M. (2014). From exclusion to inclusion in public innovation support? Innovative practices in bottom-up networks. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp.91 - 107.
Lindberg, M. and Berg Jansson, A. (2016). Regional social innovation – pinpointing socially inclusive change for smart, inclusive and sustainable growth in European regional development policy. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development. 7(2): 123-140.
Lindberg, M., Gelter, J., Karlberg, H. (2017). Tourism networking for regional place innovation in Swedish Lapland. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development.
Lindberg, M. and Portinson Hylander, J. (2017). Boundary dimensions of social innovation: Negotiating conflicts and compatibilities when developing a national agenda. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2016.1204534.
Martinelli, F. (2013). Learning from Case Studies of Social Innovation in the Field of Social Services: Creatively Balancing Top-down Universalism with Bottom-up Democracy. In Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A., Hamdouch, A. (Eds.). The international handbook on social innovation: collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A., Hamdouch, A. (Eds.) (2013). The international handbook on social innovation: collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Nicholls, A., Simon, J., Gabriel, M. (Eds.) (2015). New Frontiers in Social Innovation Research. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rønning, R. and Knutagård, M. (2015). Innovation in social welfare and human services. Routledge, London.
Sirovátka, T. & Greve, B. red. (2014). Innovation in Social Services: The Public-private Mix in Service Provision, Fiscal Policy and Employment. Farnham: Ashgate.
Tanimoto, K. (2012). The emergent process of social innovation: multi-stakeholders perspective. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development. 4(3/4): 267-280.
Wijkström, F and Zimmer, A. (Eds.) (2011). Nordic Civil Society at a Cross-Roads. Transforming the Popular Movement Tradition. Nomos, Baden-Baden.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: SAGE.
Copyright (c) 2018 European Public & Social Innovation Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Non Commercial, No Derivatives Attribution 4.0. International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.), that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).