How to deal with an "essentially contested concept" on the field? Sampling social innovations through the Delphi method
How to select cases in social innovation research? Sampling units of analysis is indeed a challenging methodological question since social innovation theory is controversial and fragmented. In the absence of any database and given the limits of conventional techniques, sampling is only possible through participative methods that make sense of opposing perceptions and contestedness. This article presents the Delphi method and its related principles of expertise, iterative consultation and consensus forming and shows how it served to identify a pool of cases of social innovation, sort them out and finally establish a sample of social innovations in a partnership research on innovative practices in domiciliary eldercare.
Ayob, Noorseha, Simon Teasdale, and Kylie Fagan. 2016. “How Social Innovation ‘Came to Be’: Tracing the Evolution of a Contested Concept.” Journal of Social Policy 45(4):635–53.
Baker, John, Karina Lovell, and Neil Harris. 2006. “How Expert Are the Experts? An Exploration of the Concept of ‘Expert’ within Delphi Panel Techniques.” Nurse Researcher 14(1):59–70.
Booto Ekionea, Jean-Pierre and Prosper Bernard. 2011. “Consensus Par La Méthode Delphi Sur Les Concepts Clés Des Capacités Organisationnelles Spécifiques de La Gestion Des Connaissances.” Recherches Qualitatives 2011(29):168–92.
Bourrée, Fanny, Philippe Michel, and Louis Rachid Salmi. 2008. “Méthodes de Consensus: Revue Des Méthodes Originales et de Leurs Grandes Variantes Utilisées En Santé Publique.” Revue d’Epidemiologie et de Sante Publique 56(6):415–23.
Brady, Shane R. 2015. “Utilizing and Adapting the Delphi Method for Use in Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 14(5):1–6.
Collier, David, Fernando Daniel Hidalgo, and Andra Olivia Maciuceanu. 2006. “Essentially Contested Concepts: Debates and Applications.” Journal of Political Ideologies 11(3):211–46.
Dalkey, Norman. 1969. The Delphi Method: An Experimental Study of Group Opinion. Santa Monica.
Evers, Adalbert and Taco Brandsen. 2016. “Social Innovations as Messages: Democratic Experimentation in Local Welfare Systems.” P. 313 in Social Innovations in the Urban context, edited by T. Brandsen, S. Cattacin, A. Evers, and A. Zimmer. Springer Open.
Fink, Arlene, Jacqueline Kosecoff, Mark Chassin, and Robert H. Brook. 1984. “Consensus Methods: Characteristics and Guidelines for Use.” American Journal of Public Health 74(9):979–83.
Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12(2):219–45.
Fougère, Martin, Beata Segercrantz, and Hannele Seeck. 2017. “A Critical Reading of the European Union’s Social Innovation Policy discourse:(Re) Legitimizing Neoliberalism.” Organization (First published date: January-09-2017):1–25.
Gallie, Walter Bryce. 1956. “Essentially Contested Concepts.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56:167–98.
Giraud, Olivier, Barbara Lucas, Katrin Falk, Susanne Kümpers, and Arnaud Lechevalier. 2014. “Innovations in Local Domiciliary Long-Term Care: From Libertarian Criticism to Normalisation.” Social Policy and Society 13(3):433–44.
Goodman, MC. 1987. “The Delphi Technique: A Critique.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 12(6):729–34.
Hamel, Jacques. 1997. Étude de Cas et Sciences Sociales. Montréal-Paris: L’HARMATTAN.
Landeta, J., J. Barrutia, and A. Lertxundi. 2011. “Hybrid Delphi: A Methodology to Facilitate Contribution from Experts in Professional Contexts.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78(9):1629–1641.
Larsson, Ola Segnestam and Taco Brandsen. 2016. “The Implicit Normative Assumptions of Social Innovation Research: Embracing the Dark Side.” Pp. 293–302 in Social Innovations in the Urban context, edited by T. Brandsen, S. Cattacin, A. Evers, and A. Zimmer. Springer Open.
Linstone, Harold A. and Murray Turoff. 1975. Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
McKenna, H. P. 1994. “The Delphi Technique: A Worthwhile Research Approach for Nursing?” Journal of Advanced Nursing 19(6):1221–25.
Montgomery, Tom. 2016. “Are Social Innovation Paradigms Incommensurable?” VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 27(4):1979–2000.
Moulaert, Frank. 2009. “Social Innovation: Institutionally Embedded, Territorially (Re)Produced.” Pp. 11–23 in Social Innovation and Territorial Development, edited by D. MacCallum, F. Moulaert, J. Hillier, and S. Vicari Haddock. Farnham, England & Burlington, USA: ASHGATE.
Murphy, MK et al. 1998. “Consensus Development Methods and Their Use in Clinical Guideline Development.” Health Technology Assessment 2(3):i–iv.
Murray, Robin, Julie Caulier-Grice, and Geoff Mulgan. 2010. The Open Book of Social Innovation. The Young Foundation & NESTA (National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts).
Nagaoka, Sadao, Kazuyuki Motohashi, and Akira Goto. 2010. “Patent Statistics as an Innovation Indicator.” Pp. 1083–1127 in Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, vol. 2.
Nyssens, Marthe. 2015. “Innovation Sociale et Entreprise Sociale: Quels Dialogues Possibles ? Une Perspective Européenne.” Pp. 335–48 in La transformation sociale par l’innovation sociale, edited by A. Camus, C. Jetté, J.-L. Klein, and M. Roy. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.
Pol, Eduardo and Simon Ville. 2009. “Social Innovation: Buzz Word or Enduring Term?” Journal of Socio-Economics 38(6):878–85.
Rialle, V. 2015. “Quelle Autonomie Peut Apporter La Technologie ? De L’aide À La Personne Âgée À La Naissance D’une Nouvelle Société.” Ethics, Medicine and Public Health 1(2):155–62.
Rowe, Gene and George Wright. 1991. “The Delphi Technique: A Re-Evaluation of Research and Theory.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 39(January 2015):235–51.
Schultz, Joseph S., Beate André, and Endre Sjøvold. 2015. “Demystifying Eldercare: Managing and Innovating from a Public-Entity’s Perspective.” International Journal of Healthcare Management 8(1):42–57.
Seawright, J. and John Gerring. 2008. “Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options.” Political Research Quarterly 61(2):294–308.
SPIRAL. 2011. “La Méthode Delphi | Spiral.” Retrieved April 12, 2017 (http://www.spiral.ulg.ac.be/fr/outils/methode-delphi/).
Stake, Robert. E. 2006. Multiple Case Study Analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
Sumsion, Thelma. 1998. “The Delphi Technique: An Adaptive Research Tool.” British Journal of Occupational Therapy 61(4):153–56.
Tapio, Petri, Riikka Paloniemi, Vilja Varho, and Markus Vinnari. 2011. “The Unholy Marriage? Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Information in Delphi Processes.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78(9):1616–28.
Wittmayer, Julia M. et al. 2015. Narratives of Change: How Social Innovation Initiatives Engage with Their Transformative Ambitions. Retrieved (http://www.transitsocialinnovation.eu/.).
Copyright (c) 2017 European Public & Social Innovation Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Non Commercial, No Derivatives Attribution 4.0. International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.), that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).