A Global Mapping of Social Innovations: Challenges of a Theory Driven Methodology

Autores/as

  • Christoph Kaletka TU Dortmund University
  • Antonius Schröder TU Dortmund University

Resumen

The article discusses and analyses challenges, constraints and prospects of a theory driven empirical research methodology in the thematic field of Social Innovation. Based on the experiences made while conducting a global mapping of social innovation initiatives, it reflects challenges such as the different
understandings and definitions of the research field and contexts related to different policy and world regions. Starting with the approach of the EU funded international project SI-DRIVE, the challenges of theory development and its methodological operationalisation and limitations in an iterative improvement by sequential empirical mappings are discussed - combining quantitative and qualitative research and results for proving and elaborating the theoretical frame (building blocks of a Social Innovation Theory). Empirical evidence shows that the theoretical development of such a ubiquitous phenomenon needs an iterative interrelation of theory and empiricism and a multi-method approach, giving leeway for the whole variety of social innovations by simultaneously developing a common understanding and concept of Social Innovation.

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir.17-1.6

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Antonius Schröder, TU Dortmund University

Member of Management Baord of the Social Research Centre (Sozialforschungsstelle)

Citas

Amaratunga, Dilanthi; Baldry, David/ Sarshar, Marjan/ Newton, Rita (2002): Quantitative and qualitative research in the built environment: application of “mixed” research approach. In: Work Study, 51(1), pp. 17 – 31.

Ball, Susan; Petsimeris, Petros (2010): Mapping Urban Social Divisions. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 11(2), Art. 37. Internet: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1002372 [last accessed 06.07.2016]

BEPA (2010): Empowering people, driving change. Social innovation in the European Union. Bureau of European Policy Advisers (Ed.), European Commission. Internet: http://www.transitsocialinnovation.eu/resource-hub/empowering-people-driving-change-social-innovation-in-the-european-union [last accessed 08.04.2016]

Butzin, Anna; Howaldt, Jürgen; Domanski, Dmitri; Kaletka, Christoph/ Weber, Matthias (2014): Conclusions. In: Howaldt, Jürgen; Butzin, Anna; Domanski, Dmitri; Kaletka, Christoph (Eds.): Theoretical approaches to social innovation: A critical literature review (D1.1.) Internet: http://www.si-drive.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/D1_1-Critical-Literature-Review_final.pdf [last accessed 29.03.2016], pp. 151-160.

Cowan, R., David, P., and Foray, D. (2000). The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(2): 211-253.

Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11: 147-162.

El-Haddadeh, Ramzi; Irani, Zahir; Millard, Jeremy; Schröder, Antonius (2014): Toward a coherent methodological framework for examining social innovation in the public sector; in: Information systems management, 31, 3/2014, p. 250-258.

European Commission. 2013. “Social Innovation Research in the European Union. Approaches, findings and future directions.” Policy Review. https://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/pdf/policy_reviews/social_innovation.pdf.

Geroski, P. A. (2000). Models of Technology Diffusion. Research Policy, 29: 603-625.

Howaldt, Jürgen; Kaletka, Christoph;/ Schröder, Antonius (2016): Social Entrepreneurs – Important Actors within an Ecosystem of Social Innovation. European Public & Social Innovation Review, Volume 1, Issue 2, 2016, 95-110.

Howaldt, Jürgen; Butzin, Anna; Domanski, Dmitri; Kaletka, Christoph (2014a): Theoretical approaches to social innovation: A critical literature review (D1.1). Internet: http://www.si-drive.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/D1_1-Critical-Literature-Review_final.pdf [last accessed 29.03.2016]

Howaldt, Jürgen; Schwarz, Michael (2010): Social Innovation: Concepts, research fields and international trends. IMO international monitoring. Internet:

http://www.sfs.tudortmund.de/odb/Repository/Publication/Doc/1289/IMO_Trendstudie_Howaldt_Schwarz_englische_Version.pdf

Howaldt, Jürgen; Schwarz, Michael (2016): Social Innovation and its Relationship to Social Change. Verifying existing Social Theories in reference to Social Innovation and its Relationship to Social Change (D1.3).

Howaldt, Jürgen; Schröder, Antonius; Kaletka, Christoph; Rehfeld, Dieter; Terstriep, Judith (2016). Mapping the World of Social Innovation. Key Results of a Comparative Analysis of 1,005 Social Innovation Initiatives at a Glance. Dortmund: TU)

Mingers J. (2001) Information, meaning, and communication: An autopoietic approach. In: Geyer F. & van der Zouwen J. (eds.) Sociocybernetics. Complexity, autopoiesis, and observation of social systems. Greenwood Press, Westport CT: 109–123.

Moulaert, Frank/ MacCallum, Diana/ Mehmood, Abid/ Hamdouch, Abdelillah (2013): The International Handbook on Social Innovation. Collective Action, Social Learnig and Transdisciplinary Research. Cheltenham UK, Northhampton MA, USA: Edward Elgar.

Mulgan, G. (2012). Social Innovation Theories: Can Theory Catch Up with Practice? In H.-W. Franz, J. Hochgerner & J. Howaldt (Eds.), Challenge Social Innovation. Potentials for Business, Social Entrepreneurship, Welfare and Civil Society (pp. 19-42). Berlin, New York: Springer.

Myers, M. D. (1997). Qualitative research in information systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 21(1), 241-242.

Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change: Harvard University Press.

Pelka, Bastian / Terstriep, Judith (2016). Mapping Social Innovation Maps. The State of Research Practice across Europe. European Public & Social Innovation Review, Volume 1, Issue 1, 2016, 3-16.

Stake, R. (2000). Case studies. In N. Denzin, Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Sage: London. pp. 407–454

Tachtsoglou, S./König, J. (2017): Die Bedeutung der Grundgesamtheit (Population). In: dies.: Statistik für Erziehungswissenschaftlerinnen und Erziehungswissenschaftler. Springer Fachmedien, Wiesbaden. S. 259-261.

Von der Lippe, P./Kladroba, A. (2002): Repräsentativität von Stichproben. In: Marketing ZFP, Jg. 24 (2), S. 139-145.

Wilterdink, N. (2014). Social change. In Encyclopædia Britannica (Ed.), Encyclopædia Britannica Online. http://www.britannica.com/topic/social-change, accessed February 11, 2016.

Descargas

Publicado

2017-12-23

Cómo citar

Kaletka, C., & Schröder, A. (2017). A Global Mapping of Social Innovations: Challenges of a Theory Driven Methodology. European Social Innovation Review, 2(1), 78–92. Recuperado a partir de https://epsir.net/index.php/epsir/article/view/50

Número

Vol. 2 Núm. 1 (2017)

Sección

Research articles

Licencia

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Non Commercial, No Derivatives Attribution 4.0. International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.), that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).