Spread and conditions of Social Innovation Research in Austria in the field of Social Sciences

Difusión y condiciones de la Investigación en Innovación Social en Austria en el ámbito de las Ciencias Sociales

  • Klaus Schuch ZSI - Centre for Social Innovation
Keywords: social innovation, Austria, social innovation in Austria, third mission, support measures

Abstract

This paper scrutinises the spread and the conditions of social innovation research in Austria in social sciences. Although the empirical results are inconclusive, social innovation is definitely not a marginal topic in social sciences in Austria. More than 80% of the responding social scientists deal with social innovation at different levels of intensity. It also seems that social innovation works well for the overall self-representation of the universities. The construct of social entrepreneurship has probably contributed most to anchoring the notion of social innovation in the higher education sector in Austria, especially in teaching. Although some curricula and courses are more confined to traditional business school topics, some transcend the narrow business focus towards sociological and political approaches. The academic embedding of social innovation in Austria, however, is still hampered by structural factors. Our findings show a lack of both tangible and intangible support measures.

 

Resumen

Este artículo examina la difusión y las condiciones de la investigación sobre la innovación social en Austria en el ámbito de las ciencias sociales. Los resultados obtenidos muestran que, aunque los datos empíricos no son concluyentes, la innovación social en Austria no es un tema marginal en el contexto de las ciencias sociales. Más del 80% de los científicos sociales que participaron en la investigación se ocupan de la innovación social en diferentes niveles de intensidad. Asimismo, se revela que la innovación social funciona bien para la autorrepresentación general de las universidades. El concepto de emprendimiento social es el que más ha contribuido a afianzar la noción de innovación social en el sector de la educación superior en Austria, especialmente en la enseñanza. Aunque algunos planes de estudio y cursos se limitan más a los temas tradicionales de las escuelas de negocios, algunos trascienden el estrecho enfoque empresarial hacia enfoques sociológicos y políticos. Sin embargo, la integración académica de la innovación social en Austria sigue viéndose obstaculizada por factores estructurales. Por tanto, los resultados muestran una falta de medidas de apoyo tanto tangibles como intangibles.

Palabras clave: innovación social; Austria; innovación social en Austria; tercera misión; medidas de apoyo.

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir.21-2.1

References

Benneworth, P. (2015). Tracing how arts and humanities research translates, circulates and consolidates in society. How have scholars been reacting to diverse impact and public value agendas? Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 14 (1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022214533888

Berry, T. U. (2015). Advanced Search Strategies for Google. The Complete Guide to Using Google in Libraries: Research, User Applications, and Networking, 2, 215-222.

BMBWF. (2019). Statistisches Taschenbuch – Hochschulen und Forschung 2019. Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung.

Brewer, J. (2013). The public value of social sciences. An interpretative essay. Bloomsbury.

Brundenius, C. (2017). Challenges of rising inequalities and the quest for inclusive and sustainable development. In C. Brundenius, B. Göransson & J. M. Carvalho de Mello (Eds.), Universities, Inclusive Development and Social Innovation (pp. 9-69). Springer.

Caro-Gonzalez, A. (2019). The “6I Research Model”: evolution of an innovation institutional STI policy framework at the University of Deusto. fteval Journal for Research and Technology Policy Evaluation, 48, 86-90. http://repository.fteval.at/id/eprint/445

Cunha, J., & Benneworth, P. (2013). Universities’ contributions to social innovation: towards a theoretical framework. EURA Conference 2013, 3-6 July, Enschede, The Netherlands.

Davies, A. (2014). Social Innovation Process and Social Entrepreneurship. In J. Howaldt, A. Butzin, D. Domanski & C. Kaletka (Eds.), Theoretical Approaches to Social Innovation. Critical Literature Review. A deliverable of the project Social Innovation: Driving Force of Social Change (SI-DRIVE) (pp. 60-78). TU Dortmund, Sozialforschungsstelle.

Fassi, D., Landoni, P., Piredda, F., & Salvadeo, P. (2020). Universities as Drivers of Social Innovation. Theoretical Overview and Lessons from the "campUS"’ Research. Springer.

Howaldt, J. (2019). New pathways to social change – creating impact through social innovation research. fteval Journal for Research and Technology Policy Evaluation, 48, 37-48. http://repository.fteval.at/id/eprint/434

JKU. (2020). Curriculum zum Bachelorstudium Sozialwissenschaften. UK 033/528, https://www.jku.at/fileadmin/gruppen/32/ZUS/Curricula/Bachelor/10_BS_Soziologie_MTB33_230617.pdf; accessed on 12 November 2020.

Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. N. (2005). Universities in National Innovation Systems. In J. Fageberg, D. C. Mowery & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (pp. 209-239). Oxford University Press.

Nicholls, A., & Huybrechts, B. (2012). Social Entrepreneurship: Definition, Drivers, and Challenges. In C. Volkmann, K. Torarski & K. Ernst (Eds.), Social Entrepreneurship and Social Business (pp. 31-48). Springer Gabler.

Nussbaum, M. (2010). Not for Profit. Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton University Press.

Perrini, F. (2006). The New Social Entrepreneurship: What Awaits Social Entrepreneurship Ventures? Edward Elgar.

Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering Social Innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Fall edition, 35-43.

Reale, E., D. Abramov, K. Canhial, C., Donovan, R., Flecha et al. (2017). A review of literature on evaluating the scientific, social, and political impact of social sciences and humanities research. Research Evaluation, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx025

Renault, T. B., Carvalho de Mello, J. M., & Araújo, F. (2017). Social development as an academic mission of Brazilian universities: public policies and the case of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. In: C. Brundenius, B. Göransson, & J. M. Carvalho de Mello, (Eds.), Universities, Inclusive Development and Social Innovation, (pp. 71-96). Springer.

Russegger, G. (2019). SSHA-driven knowledge transfer within the third mission of universities. fteval Journal for Research and Technology Policy Evaluation, 48, 62-65. http://repository.fteval.at/id/eprint/438

Schuch, K. (2019). The contribution of social sciences and humanities to social innovation. In J. Howaldt, A. Schröder, C. Kaletka & M. Zirngiebl (Eds.), Atlas of Social Innovation, 2nd Volume: A World of New Practices (pp. 95-98). Oekom Verlag.

Tuunainen, J., Svento, R., Haddington, P., Ojutkangas, K., & Aalto, S. (2019). The Oulu way of strengthening social impact of SSH sciences: from linear models of impact to productive interactions and beyond. fteval Journal for Research and Technology Policy Evaluation, 48, 86-90. http://repository.fteval.at/id/eprint/442

Westley, F., & Antadze, N. (2010). Making a difference: strategies for scaling social innovation for greater impact. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 15(2), 2-19.

Published
2021-12-30
How to Cite
Schuch, K. (2021). Spread and conditions of Social Innovation Research in Austria in the field of Social Sciences . European Public & Social Innovation Review, 6(2), 1-14. Retrieved from https://pub.sinnergiak.org/esir/article/view/141
Section
Research articles