Threats of employment precarization in Russia in the context of digitalization of the economy and society

Amenazas de la precarización del empleo en Rusia en el contexto de la digitalización de la economía y la sociedad

Keywords: digitalization, precarious employment, labor market, digital economy, labor relations, employment precarization

Abstract

Digitalization of public life has a serious impact on the development of social and labor relations. In spite of the fact that digitalization has many positive effects, we can point out that the issue of employment precarization is coming to the fore and it is reflected in the growth of vulnerability and social insecurity among workers. This trend is manifested to the fullest extent in the Russian society. In this regard our paper considers theoretical and practical issues of employment precarization in Russia in the context of its rapid digitalization. In the course of our analysis we clarify the concept of precarious employment, identify digitalization trends and the extent and causes of instability in the social and labor sphere. In particular, we have found out that more and more people are involved in unstable labor relations against the background of the rapidly forming digital environment in the country.

Resumen

La  digitalización  de  la  vida  pública  tiene  un  grave  impacto  en  el  desarrollo  de  las  relaciones  sociales  y  laborales.  A  pesar  de  que  la  digitalización  tiene  muchos  efectos  positivos,  puede  afirmarse    que  las  cuestiones  relacionadas  con  la  precarización  del  empleo  están  cobrando  relevancia  y  se  reflejan  en  el  incremento  de  la  vulnerabilidad  y  la  inseguridad  social  de  los  trabajadores.  Esta  tendencia  se  manifiesta  en  toda  su  extensión  en  la  sociedad  rusa.  En  este  sentido,  el  artículo  analiza  las  cuestiones  teóricas  y  prácticas  de  la  precarización  del  empleo  en  Rusiaen  el  contexto  de  su  rápida  digitalización.  En   el   análisis   se   aborda   el   concepto   de   empleo   precario,   se   identifican   las   tendencias   de   la  digitalización,  el  alcance  y  las  causas  de  la  inestabilidad  en  la  esfera  laboral  y  social.  En  particular,  los  resultados   evidencian   que   cada   vez   más   personas   se   ven   afectadas   por  las  relaciones   laborales  inestables  en  el  contexto  del  entorno  de  trabajo  digital  que  se  está  formando  rápidamente  en  el  país.

Palabras clave: precarización  del  empleo;  digitalización;  empleo  precario;  mercado  de  trabajo;  economía  digital;  relaciones  laborales.

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir.19-2.1

 

 

Author Biographies

Andrei Vasilevich Popov, Vologda Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Researcher, Candidate of Economics

Tatiana Sergeevna Soloveva, Vologda Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Researcher

References

Abdrakhmanova, G., Demyanova, A., Dranev, Y., Dyachenko, E., Fridlyanova, S., Fursov, K., ... Kovaleva, G. (2019). Digital Economy Indicators in the Russian Federation: 2019. Moscow: HSE.

Agency for Digitisation Denmark. (2016). A Stronger and More Secure Digital Denmark. Digital Strategy 2016-2020. Copenhagen: Agency for Digitisation. Available at: https://digst.dk/media/16165/ds_singlepage_uk_web.pdf

Bizyukov, P.V. (2013). Unstable forms of employment as a form of degradation of labor relations. The Russian public opinion herald. Data. Analysis. Discussions, 1, 100-109. (In Russian). URL http://www.levada.ru/sites/default/files/vom_1_2013_0.pdf

Bobkov, V.N., Kvachev, V.G., & Kolmakov, I.B. et al. (2018). Precarious employment in Russian Federation: theory and methodology of identification, evaluation and reduction. Moscow: KNORUS.

Brass, I.C., & Hornsby, D. (2019). Digital technological innovation and the international political economy. In T. Shaw, L. Mahrenbach, R. Modi, & X. Yi-Chong (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary International Political Economy (рр. 615-631). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Broughton, A., Green, M., Rickard, C., Swift, S., Eichhorst, W., Tobsch, V., & Tros, F. (2016). Precarious employment in Europe. Part 1. Patterns, trends and policy strategies. Brussels: European Parliament.

Campbell, I. & Price, R. (2016|). Precarious Work and Precarious Workers: Towards an Improved Conceptualisation. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 7(3), 314-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304616652074

Choi, H. & Mattoni, A. (2010). The contentious field of precarious work in Italy: political actors, strategies and coalitions. WorkingUSA, 13, 213-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-4580.2010.00284.x

Cranford, C., Vosko, L., & Zukewich N. (2003). Precarious employment in the Canadian labor market: a statistical portrait. Just labour, 3, 6-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25071/1705-1436.164

Cranford, C.J., Vosko, L.F., & Zukewich, N. (2003). The Gender of Precarious Employment in Canada. Industrial Relations, 58(3), 454-482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/007495ar

Daheim, C. & Wintermann, O. (2017). 2050: The Future of Work. Findings of an International Delphi-Study of The Millennium Project. Available at: https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/en/publications/publication/did/2050-the-future-of-work/

European Commission. (2010). A Digital Agenda for Europe. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels: European Commission.

European Commission. (2014). Undeclared work in the European Union. Brussels: European Commission. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2767/37041

Fudge, J. & Owens, R. (2006). Precarious Work, Women, and the New Economy: The Challenge to Legal Norms. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

G20 DETF. (2016). G20 Digital Economy Development and Cooperation Initiative. Toronto: G20. Available at: http://www.g20.utoronto.ca/2016/g20-digital-economy-development-andcooperation.pdf

I-DESI. (2018). International Digital Economy and Society Index. Final report. SMART 2017/0052. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2759/745483

International Labour Organization (ILO). (2012). From precarious work to decent work. Outcome Document to the Workers’ Symposium on Policies and Regulations to combat Precarious Employment. Geneva: ILO.

International Labour Organization (ILO). (2016). Non-standard employment around the world: Understanding challenges, shaping prospects. Geneva: ILO.

Kalleberg, A.L. (2009). Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400101

Kalleberg, A.L. (2014). Measuring Precarious Work. A Working Paper of the EINet Measurement Group. November. Available at: https://ssascholars.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/einet/files/einet_papers_kalleberg.pdf

Kalleberg, A.L. & Vallas, S.P. (2018). Probing Precarious Work: Theory, Research, and Politics. In A.L. Kalleberg & S.P. Vallas (eds.), Precarious Work (pp. 1-30). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.

Lapidus, L.V. & Polyakova, Yu.М. (2018). Hygonomics as a new socio-economic model: the development of freelancing and crowdsourcing. The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, (6), 73-89. Available at: http://inecon.org/images/stories/publicacii/vesnik-ran/2018/VIE_RAS_6_2018.pdf

Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, HG., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industrie 4.0. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6, 239-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4

Popov, E.V. & Semyachkov, K.A. (2018). Problems of Economic Security for Digital Society in the Context of Globalization. Economy of Region, 14(4), 1088-1101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17059/2018-4-3

Popov, А.V. (2018). The expansion of precarious work as a constraint on Russia’s economic growth. Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia, 212(4), 270-293. (In Russian). Available at: http://www.veorus.ru/upload/iblock/a6a/veo_212.pdf

Quinlan, M., Mayhew, C. & Bohle, P. (2001). The Global Expansion of Precarious Employment, Work Disorganization, and Consequences for Occupational Health: A Review of Recent Research. International Journal of Health Services, 31(2), 335-414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/607H-TTV0-QCN6-YLT4

Rodgers, G. & Rodgers, J. (1989). Precarious Jobs in Labour Market Regulation: The Growth of Atypical Employment in Western Europe. Brussels: International Labour Organisation.

Sizova, I. & Khusyainov, T. (2017). Labor and employment in the digital economy: The problems of the Russian labor market. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 10(4), 376-396.

Srnicek, N. & Williams, A. (2015). Inventing the Future: Postcapitalism and a World without Work. London: Verso.

United Nations. (2018). United Nations E-Government survey 2018. Gearing e-government to support transformation towards sustainable and resilient societies. NY: United Nations.

Veredyuk, O.V. (2013). Instability of Employment: Theoretical Concept and Assessment of its Scale in Russia. St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies, (1), 25-32. (In Russian). Available at: https://economicsjournal.spbu.ru/article/view/2058

Walwei, U. (2016). Digitalization and structural labour market problems: The case of Germany. International Labour Organization, Working Papers, 994936693502676.

Zakaluzhnaya, N.V. (2015). Contract and Agency Labor and Unstable Employment: Russian and Foreign Experience. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, (4), 116-128. (In Russian). Available at: https://law-journal.hse.ru/data/2016/01/13/1134662203/закалюжная.pdf

Published
2019-12-30
How to Cite
Popov, A. V., & Soloveva, T. S. (2019). Threats of employment precarization in Russia in the context of digitalization of the economy and society. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 4(2), 1-13. Retrieved from https://pub.sinnergiak.org/esir/article/view/109
Section
Research articles