When collaborative development meets New Public Governance: The case of Etorkizuna Eraikiz Territorial Development Lab in Gipuzkoa

Ainhoa Arrona, Miren Estensoro, Miren Larrea, Eduardo Sisti


Etorkizuna Eraikiz Territorial Development Lab (TDLab) is a long-term action research process that has produced a change towards more horizontal forms of territorial development and policymaking governance in Gipuzkoa. The article analyses this experience to reflect on the role of public organisations in steering cooperative forms of territorial development. Specifically, the article suggests that cooperative forms of territorial development may need network-based public organisations; and it shows that TDLab has fostered and embodied practices framed under New Public Governance (NPG), a network-based public administration paradigm. By reflecting on how such practices were fostered in TDLab, the article also suggests a potential complementarity between New Public Governance and action research for territorial development, the research approach and change strategy developed in TDLab, as a means of better contributing to network based public organisations.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir.18-1.4

Full Text:



Alburquerque, F., Costamagna, P., & Ferraro, C. (2008). Desarrollo local, descentralización y democracia. Ideas para un cambio. San Martín: UNSAM.

Barca, F., Mccann, P., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134–152.

Beer, A., & Clower, T. (2014). Mobilizing leadership in cities and regions. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 1(1), 5–20.

Bevir, M. (2013). A new governance: hierarchies, markets, and networks, c. 1979-2010. In M. Osawa & M. Suginohara (Eds.), ISS Research Series No 55. Reconsidering governance: an interdisciplinary approach , 9-26.

Bristow, G. (2010). Resilient regions: re-’place’ing regional competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3(1), 153–167.

Brugué, Q., Canal, R., & Paya, P. (2015). ¿Inteligencia administrativa para abordar “problemas malditos”? El caso de las comisiones interdepartamentales. Gestión y Política Pública, XXIV(1), 85–130.

Costamagna, P., & Larrea, M. (2017). Personas facilitadoras: su papel en la construcción de capacidades para el desarrollo territorial (Serie Desa). Bilbao: Publicaciones Deusto.

Estensoro, M. (2012). Local networks and socially innovative territories. The case of the Basque Region and Goierri County. University of the Basque Country.

Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to action research. Social science for social change (Second Ed.). Thousand Oaks (California): SAGE Publications.

Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: past and present. Public Money & Management, 25(1), 27–34.

Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked problems: implications for public policy and management. Administration & Society, 47(6), 711–739.

Karlsen, J. (2010). Regional complexity and the need for engaged governance. Ekonomiaz: Revista Vasca de Economía, 74(2), 36–55.

Karlsen, J., & Larrea, M. (2014). Territorial development and action research: innovation through dialogue. Farnhman: Gower.

Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. (2016). Governance networks in the public sector. Oxon, UK: Routledge.

Laranja, M. (2012). Network governance of innovation policies: the Technological Plan in Portugal. Science and Public Policy, 39(5), 655–668.

OECD. (2010). Regional development policies in OECD Countries. Investigaciones regionales. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Orkestra, & Gipuzkoako Foru Aldundia. (2015). Gipuzkoa Sarean. Bidean. Donostia - San Sebastián: Gipuzkoako Foru Aldundia.

Osborne, S. P. (2006). The new public governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387.

Pike, A., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Tomaney, J. (2007). What kind of local and regional development and for whom? Regional Studies, 41(9), 1253–1269.

Pollitt, C., & Hupe, P. (2011). Talking about government. The role of magic concepts. Public Management Review, 13(5), 641–658.

Sotarauta, M. (2005). Shared leadership and dynamic capabilities in regional development. In I. Sagan & H. Halkier (Eds.), Regionalism contested: institution, society and governance. (pp. 53–72). Cornwall: Ashgate.

Sotarauta, M. (2009). Power and influence tactics in the promotion of regional development: An empirical analysis of the work of Finnish regional development officers. Geoforum, 40(5), 895–905.

Torfing, J., & Triantafillou, P. (2013). What’s in a name? Grasping new public governance as a political-administrative system. International Review of Public Administration, 18(2), 9–25.

Torfing, J., & Triantafillou, P. (2016). Enhancing public innovation by transforming public governance? In J. Torfing & P. Triantafillou (Eds.), Enhancing public innovation by transforming public governance (pp. 1–32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Waldorff, S. B., Ebbesen, B. V., & Kristensen, L. S. (2014). The complexity of governance: challenges for public sector innovation. In C. K. Ansell & J. Torfing (Eds.), Public innovation through collaboration and design. (pp. 70–88). New York: Routledge.


  • There are currently no refbacks.


This work is licensed under Creative Commons 4.0. International. Editorial Sinnergiak