Contributing to Civic Innovation through Participatory Action Research

Kees Biekart

Abstract


Civic innovation is about focusing on what is positive, creative and imaginative in the face of a world that seems beset by crisis narratives. In exploring the term civic innovation, we are not looking for a new theory and practice that will lead to a grand transformation of neoliberal capitalism but rather at how to build a mosaic of responses by looking at what is happening on the ground where people are living the contradictions of development. It is argued that we need to question pre-determined ideas of what measures to take and go beyond universal policy solutions, in order to look with openness at the actions on the ground. In that sense, civic innovation can be perceived as the ‘political sister’ of social innovation as it directly assesses dominant power relations. The paper explores a different and trans-disciplinary approach to researching change: by descending from the academic ivory tower, respecting and deploying multiple knowledges for civic innovation, as well as approaching change with the ideas and tools of Participatory Action Research. Examples from knowledge dialogues with Central American social movements are used to explore this methodology further, including the downsides and the dilemmas. The paper concludes that patient dialogue, reflexivity, and experimentation are probably key features of knowledge production that may embody progressive social change.

 

Key words: Civic Innovation, reflexivity, Participatory Action Research (PAR), knowledge dialogues,  transdisciplinarity, Central America.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ackroyd, S. (2009) ‘Research Designs for Realist Research’, in D. A. Buchanan and A. Bryman (eds) Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, pp. 533-548. London: Sage.

Clegg, S.R. & T.S. Pitsis (2012) ‘Pronesis, Projects and Power Research’, in B. Flyvbjerg, T. Landman and S. Schram (2012) Real Social Science: Applied Phronesis, pp. 66-91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dekker, P. and Evers, A. (2009) ‘Civicness and the Third Sector: Introduction’, Voluntas, 20(3), 217-219.

Dzurec, L.C. & I.L. Abraham (1993) 'The Nature of Inquiry: Linking Quantitative and Qualitative Research', Advances in Nursing Science 16(1): 73-79.

Escobar, A. (2008) Territories of Difference, place, movement, life, redes. Duke: Duke University Press.

Fals-Borda, O. (2006) ‘Participatory (Action) Research in Social Theory: Origins and Challenges’. In P. Reason and H. Bradbury (eds) Handbook of Action Research, London: Sage, pp. 27-37.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2001) Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and how it can Succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Flyvbjerg, B., T. Landman & S. Schram (2012) Real Social Science: Applied Phronesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fowler, A. (2013a) Civic Driven Change; Where From, Where Now, Where Next, Valedictory Lecture, The Hague: Institute of Social Studies.

http://www.iss.nl/fileadmin/ASSETS/iss/Documents/Academic_publications/Fowler_-_Valedictory_Final_Oct_2013.pdf

Fowler, A. (2013b) ‘Social Innovation: New Game, New Dawn, or False Promise?’ Hivos Knowledge Programme (October).

https://www.hivos.org/social-innovation-new-game-new-dawn-or-false-promise

Haraway, D. (1988) 'Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective', Feminist Studies 14(3): 575-599.

Harward, D. (ed), (2013) Civic Values, Civic Practices, Washington, D.C: The Civic Series, Bringing Theory to Practice.

Harding, S. (1992) ‘Subjectivity, Experience and Knowledge: An Epistemology from/for Rainbow Coalition Politics’, Development and Change 23(3): 175-193.

Harding, S. (1991) ‘What Is Feminist Epistemology?’, in S. Harding Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives. Buckingham: Open University Press, pp. 105-137.

Hempel, C.G. & P. Oppenheim (1948) 'Studies in the Logic of Explanation', Philosophy of Science 15(2): 135-175.

Intemann, K. (2010) '25 Years of Feminist Empiricism and Standpoint Theory: Where are we Now?', Hypatia 25(4): 778-796.

Jackson, C. (2006) 'Feminism Spoken here: Epistemologies for Interdisciplinary Development Research', Development and Change 37(3): 525-547.

Kindon, S., Pain, R. & Kesby, M. (eds.) (2007) Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place. London & New York: Routledge.

Leyva Solano, X. and S. Speed (2008). Hacia la investigación descolonizada: nuestra experiencia de co-labor”. In Leyva Solano and Speed (coord.) Gobernar (en) la diversidad: Experiencias Indigenas desde América Latina. Hacia la Investigación de Co-labor. CIESAS/FLACSO, pp. 65-110.

Longino, H.E. (2004) 'How Values can be Good for Science', in P. Machamer and G. Wolters (eds) Science, Values, and Objectivity, pp. 127-142. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Max-Neef, M. (2005) ‘Foundations of transdisciplinarity’, Ecological Economics 53 (1): 5-16.

McTaggart, R. (1989) ’16 tenets of Participatory Action Research (PAR)’. http://www.caledonia.org.uk/par.htm.

Polletta, F., P. Ching, B. Chen, B. G. Gardner & A. Motes (2011) ‘The Sociology of Storytelling’, Annual Review Sociology 37: 109–30.

Simmons, W.P. (2012) ‘Making the Teaching of Social Justice Matter’, in B. Flyvbjerg, T. Landman and S. Schram (2012) Real Social Science: Applied Phronesis, pp. 246-263. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sinha, S. & L. Back (2014) ‘Making Methods Sociable: Dialogue, Ethics and Authorship in Qualitative Research’, Qualitative Research 14(4): 473–487.

Sousa Santos, B. de (2014) Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. Boulder and London: Paradigm Publishers.

Stremmelaar, J. (2009) ‘Knowledge integration for development: The Hivos approach’. Knowledge Management for Development Journal, 5(1), pp. 75-84.

Valverde, J. M. (2008) ‘Programa de conocimientos: Elementos conceptuales y metodológicos’. Mimeo, San José.

Wittmayer, J.M. Schäpke,N., Steenbergen, F. van & Omann, I. (2014) Making sense of sustainability transitions locally: how action research contributes to addressing societal challenges, Critical Policy Studies, 8:4, 465-485, DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2014.957336


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 European Public & Social Innovation Review

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Creative Commons License Copyright Sinnergiak - Some rights reserved. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial 3.0. Editorial Sinnergiak