Social Entrepreneurs: Important Actors within an Ecosystem of Social Innovation
Abstract
The state of research on social entrepreneurship is unsatisfactory. Social entrepreneurship research has been a key topic of the social innovation debate, contributing a lot to the development of the design, motives and practices to solve social demands and societal challenges mainly in the third sector, focusing at the role, possibilities and constraints of a social entrepreneurs and the social (instead of a market-driven) economy. However, the strong focus on social entrepreneurship fails to recognize other key aspects and the potential of a comprehensive concept of social innovation and its relationship to social change.
Since findings from innovation research point out the systemic character of innovations, the strong concentration on social entrepreneurs as individuals responsible for innovations can be challenged. Instead, a differentiated perspective of the role of social entrepreneurs is needed, taking into account the different phases of the social innovation process as well as cross-sector collaborations with the whole diversity of societal actors (private and public actors, universities, and civil society).
The purpose of our paper is to draw a systematic connection between these two aspects by contributing to a common theoretical ground based on social innovation theory and linking the burgeoning field of social entrepreneurship research with the comprehensive concept of social innovation and its contribution to social change.
References
Austin, J. E., Gutiérrez, R., Ogliastri, E., and Reficco, E. (2007). Capitalizing on convergence. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 5(1), 24-31.
Blättel-Mink, B. (2006). Kompendium der Innovationsforschung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Bureau of European Policy Advisers (2010). Empowering people, driving change: Social innovation in the European Union. Accessed July 8, 2015. http://ec.europa.eu/bepa/pdf/publications_pdf/.
Crozier, M., and Friedberg, E. (1993). Die Zwänge kollektiven Handelns: Über Macht und Organisation. Frankfurt am Main: Hain.
Davies, A. (2014). Social innovation process and social entrepreneurship. In: J. Howaldt, A. Butzin, D. Domanski, and C. Kaletka (eds.), Theoretical approaches to social innovation: A critical literature review (pp. 60–78). http://www.si-drive.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/D1_1-Critical-Literature-Review_final.pdf.
Emerson, J. (2003). The blended value map. Integrating social and financial returns. California Management Review, 45(4), 34–51.
European Commission (2013). Social Innovation Research in the European Union. Approaches, findings and future directions. Policy Review. https://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/pdf/policy_reviews/social_innovation.pdf.
FORA (2010). New Nature of Innovation. Report to the OECD. Accessed July 08, 2015. http://www.newnatureofinnovation.org/introduction.html
Franz, H.-W., Hochgerner, J. and Howaldt, J. (2012). Challenge social innovation: Potentials for business, social entrepreneurship, welfare and civil society. Berlin, New York: Springer.
Harrisson, D., Bourque, R. and Széll, G. (2009). Social Innovation, Economic Development, Employment and Democracy. In: R. Bourque, D. Harrisson and G. Széll (eds.), Social innovation, the social economy, and world economic development. Democracy and labour rights in an era of globalization (pp. 7–15). Frankfurt am Main/New York: Peter Lang.
Howaldt, J., Butzin, A., Domanski, D. and Kaletka, C. (2014). Theoretical approaches to social innovation: A critical literature review. Accessed July 08, 2015. http://www.si-drive.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/D1_1-Critical-Literature-Review_final.pdf.
Howaldt, J., Domanski, D. and Schwarz, M. (2015). Rethinking Social Entrepreneurship: The Concept of Social Entrepreneurship under the Perspective of Socio-scientific Innovation Research. Journal of Creativity and Business Innovation, (1), 88–89. http://www.journalcbi.com/social-entrepreneurship.html.
Howaldt, J., Kopp, R. and Schwarz, M. (2015). On the theory of social innovations. Tarde’s neglected contribution to the development of sociological innovation theory. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa. http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/41963.
Howaldt, J., and Schwarz, M. (2010). Social Innovation. Concepts, research fields and inter-national trends. In: K. Henning and F. Hees (eds.), Studies for Innovation in a Modern Working Environment. IMO International Monitoring (Vol 5), Aachen: Eigenverlag. http://www.sfs.tu-dortmund.de/cms/en/social_innovation/publications/
IMO-MAG_Howaldt_final_mit_cover.pdf.
Jaeggi, R. (2013). Kritik von Lebensformen. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Jessop, B., Moulaert, F., Hulgård, L. and Hamdouch, A. (2013). Social innovation research: a new stage in innovation analysis? In: F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood and A. Hamdouch (eds.), The International Handbook on Social Innovation. Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research (pp. 110–130). Cheltenham: Elgar.
Klein, J.-L., Jetté, C., Camus, A., Champagne, C. and Roy, M. (2016): La Transformation Sociale Par L'innovation Sociale. Quebec: Presses de l'Universite du Quebec.
Kuhn, T. S. (1996). Die Struktur wissenschaftlicher Revolutionen (13th Eds.). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Mair, J. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: Taking stock and looking ahead. In: A. Fayolle and H. Matlay (eds.), Handbook of research on social entrepreneurship (pp. 16–33). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Marg, S., Geiges, L., Butzlaff, F. and Walter, F. (2013). Die neue Macht der Bürger: Was motiviert die Protestbewegungen? BP-Gesellschaftsstudie. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung.
McGowan, K., and Westley, F. (2015). At the root of change: the history of social innovation. In: A. Nicholls, J. Simon, and M. Gabriel (eds.), New frontiers in social innovation research (pp. 52-68). Palgrave Macmillan.
Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A. and Hamdouch, A. (2013). The International Handbook on Social innovation. Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Cheltenham: Elgar.
Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw, E. and González, S. (2005). Towards alternative model(s) of local innovation. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1969–1990.
Mulgan, G. (2015). Foreword. In: A. Nicholls, J. Simon, and M. Gabriel (eds.), New frontiers in social innovation research (pp. x-xviii). Palgrave Macmillan.
Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J. and Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation. http://www.nesta.org.uk/library/documents/.
Nicholls, A., Simon, J. and Gabriel, M. (2015). New Frontiers in Social Innovation Research. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ogburn, W. F. (1969). Erneute Betrachtung des Problems der sozialen Evolution. In: Otis D. Duncan (eds.), Soziologische Texte. Band 56. William F. Ogburn. Kultur und Sozialer Wandel. Ausgewählte Schriften (pp. 50-67). Neuwied, Berlin: Luchterhand.
Phills Jr., J. A., Deiglmeier, K. and Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering Social Innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(3), 33-43.
Pol, E. and Ville, S. (2009). Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(6), 878-885.
Rorty, R. (2008). Philosophie als Kulturpolitik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Rückert-John, J. (2013). Die Nachhaltigkeit der Debatte um soziale Innovationen - Innovationsschub für den nachhaltigen Wandel. In: J. Rückert-John (eds.), Soziale Innovation und Nachhaltigkeit. Perspektiven sozialen Wandels (pp. 289–307). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Schäfers, B. (2002). Sozialstruktur und sozialer Wandel in Deutschland. Stuttgart: Lucius and Lucius.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1964). Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot.
Sgaragli, F. (2014). Enabling Social Innovation Ecosystems for Community-led Territorial Development. Rom: Fondazione Giacomo Brodolini.
Shaw, E., and de Bruin, A. (2013). Reconsidering capitalism: The promise of social innovation and social entrepreneurship? International Small Business Journal, 31(7), 737‐746.
Shove, E. (2010). Beyond the ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change. Environment and Planning, (42), 1273–85. http://epn.sagepub.com/content/42/6/1273.full.pdf+html.
Shove, E., Pantzar, M. and Watson, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. Los Angeles: SAGE
Tarde, G. (2009). Die Gesetze der Nachahmung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Vosse, C. (2009). Social Entrepreneurship und politische Koordinierung. In: M. Henkel, J. Gebauer, J. Lodemann, F. Mohaupt, L. Partzsch, E. Wascher, and R. Ziegler (eds.), Social Entrepreneurship. Status Quo 2009 (Selbst)Bild, Wirkung und Zukunftsverantwortung (pp. 35-42). Berlin, Greifswald: Berlin HUB.
Wallin, S. (2010). The co-evolvement in local development - From the triple to the quadruple helix model. Conference Paper presented at Triple Helix VIII, Madrid, October 2010. http://www.leydesdorff.net/th8/TRIPLE%20HELIX%20-%20VIII%20CONFERENCE/PROCEEDINGS/0110_Wallin_Sirkku_O-104/triple%20helix%20Wallin%20final.pdf.
Welzer, H. (2013). Selbst denken: Eine Anleitung zum Widerstand. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer.
Copyright (c) 2017 European Public & Social Innovation Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Non Commercial, No Derivatives Attribution 4.0. International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.), that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
